Great post! Challenges the notion that propositional knowledge is fine if you just let it stay with AI. Turns out that knowledge is only knowledge if it is embedded in one's head and can be primed to allow construction of other types of knowledge onto it.
Reading is a slow deliberative process that can't be fast tracked. It requires time! Thanks for reminding us that all the AI Brouhaha cannot replace the knowledge acquisition process we gain from Reading.
Thank you! Yes! We will be much better users of AI if we know more to start. It can be a support in thinking and expressing thought, but there has to be thought there to start. The thing that I’m pondering now is the idea that our thinking skills are tied to our knowledge. I think Bloom’s and Webb’s Depth of Knowledge have misled educators to believe we can teach those skills in isolation, which then leads us to believe that we can use thinking skills with AI absent of knowledge. That’s so wrong headed that it isn’t even wrong.
Great post! Challenges the notion that propositional knowledge is fine if you just let it stay with AI. Turns out that knowledge is only knowledge if it is embedded in one's head and can be primed to allow construction of other types of knowledge onto it.
Reading is a slow deliberative process that can't be fast tracked. It requires time! Thanks for reminding us that all the AI Brouhaha cannot replace the knowledge acquisition process we gain from Reading.
Thank you! Yes! We will be much better users of AI if we know more to start. It can be a support in thinking and expressing thought, but there has to be thought there to start. The thing that I’m pondering now is the idea that our thinking skills are tied to our knowledge. I think Bloom’s and Webb’s Depth of Knowledge have misled educators to believe we can teach those skills in isolation, which then leads us to believe that we can use thinking skills with AI absent of knowledge. That’s so wrong headed that it isn’t even wrong.